shittywebcomics:

bellend08:

felicaavendale:

askgraphiteknight:

felicaavendale:

askgraphiteknight:

And shooting videogames/movies make you a person who likes murder right?

You’re being weirdly dense about this loli/shota thing for some odd reason.

“ And shooting videogames/movies make you a person who likes murder right?”

Uh, yes? Otherwise, why would you be buying and consuming this product?

The problem with enjoying underage children in any form is that it sends the signal to people that: ‘I enjoy underage characters for their sexuality.’ People aren’t looking for nuance after they’ve found out that you’re attracted to twelve year old children even if they’re just drawn or 3-D animated or whatever dumb cop-out people want to use to justify themselves.

Being sexually attracted to underage children is wrong, it doesn’t matter if they’re real or animated or drawn or whatever. It’s still wrong.

My bad, I worded that a little wrong. Should be “And shooting videogames/movies make you a murderer right?”

“it doesn’t matter if they’re real” I’m sorry that you believe people are unable to differentiate between the two.

Stop dodging. Being attracted to children is wrong, yes? Are we on the same page there? Or is masturbating to children fine because they’re animated?

I don’t think I have a holier-than-thou bias, I just feel like you’re not acknowledging the point I was making. If I’m wrong there, then, by all means, point out some ways in which it’s totally cool and awesome get a sexual thrill off of kids.

Here, I’ll try to spell it out: Being aroused by children, as an adult, in any capacity is wrong. Y/N?

Playing this scenario by your rules, the fact you made this goony ultimatum but haven’t made a post condemning Bailey1rox is problematic, since your lack of explicit condemnation means you tacitly approve of their fetishization of children, including mutilated boys. Except you can’t renege on your tacit approval because you already explicitly approved of Bailey1rox‘s collage on anime.

Also there’s the whole ‘generalising and shaming people with fictional kinks and then getting mad at people who shame you for your real-life kinks’ thing. Although really that’s a false equivalence - fictional kinks have no real-life consequence.

Also this annoying disingenuous argument ignores the fact that no, playing violent video games do not make people enjoy murder, in fact all evidence objectively proves the exact opposite, and people who jack off to loli porn will probably never molest a child, no matter how gross or wrong the porn is, if it’s not real.  None of it results in real life crime.

The reason why the bailey1rox post was so retarded and worthless was because it repeats the exploded and debunked leftist/liberal/social justice/feminist argument that “portrayal of X in entertaining causes X in real life.”  Everyone KNOWS that’s a lie now except for social justice liberals.