shittywebcomics:

communismkills:

market-icon:

association-of-free-people:

mmmmspooky96:

stephendiazdelgado:

christyna-c:

ownnator:

THIS JUST IN

Anita Sarkeesian & Co. have begun lobbying for internet censorship laws and coordinated, expansive, mass blocking of anyone who posts certain types of content.

Under these laws, publicly insulting or disagreeing with someone using digital communication would be considered a hate crime. Using this standard, anyone who’s ever had an argument online could be fined or jailed.

This is what feminists and social justice warriors want — the end of free speech, and the beginning of totalitarianism on the net.

Feminists have been doing this for years offline…….

Let this pass and use this against the feminist social justice warriors to take them down a peg.

THIS JUST IN

Anita Sarkeesian is a fucking cunt.

These people need to be mercilessly made fun of and laughed out of the room. The idea of “hate crime” is bad enough in principle but even worse in application. As we’ve seen with existing hate crime law; they’re entirely subjective, political, unevenly applied and weaponized.

Pseudonyms for civil lawsuits because you don’t like what someone said? Really? Gosh, that wouldn’t open up floodgates of judicial abuse and clog an already broken system on top of crushing free speech, would it?

Feminism has become this pseudointellectual puritanism. These are the feminist crusades.

But we need the government to regulate the internet because of those evil corporations.

The exact how and why of liberals justifying censorship and removing personal freedoms, by spouting “civil rights” and “safe spaces.”

Make no mistake, when a liberal says “civil rights” they are talking specifically about removing your rights.  And just look.  They have all the justification they need for it.  They’re going to make it happen.